I
use two decorative techniques to make my jewelry boxes. Both involve the lamination
of solid wood into patterned blocks which are then resawn for use. If the exposed
patterned surface is end grain, then the panels are cut at about 1/4" thickness,
and used in the jewelry box as solid panels which are set into grooves, but not
glued in place. For the inlay banding jewelry boxes, the surface of the pattern
blocks are face grain, and the inlay banding is cut at about 1/16" thickness,
and glued to a composite substrate, or possibly a thicker piece of solid wood.
Neither of these is properly an example of either inlay or marquetry, although
in the case of the bandings the distinction between what I do and marquetry is
somewhat subtle. But since the inlay bandings I make are sawn from solid wood
thick enough to sand clean they don't suffer from the problems that effect marquetry,
assembled from commercial veneers sliced only 1/40" thick. These problems
occur because the tears and defects that are inevitable in the production of veneer
can not be sanded out of such thin material, irregularities that might take a
full year to become visible. Also, since I glue the blocks together before the
pieces are sliced, with both of these techniques my jewelry boxes' decorated surfaces
achieve tight, gap-free seams, tighter than even the most carefully laid marquetry
could ever be, since those pieces aren't glued to each other, only to the substrate.
I don't mean to disparage marquetry, and I think the beauty of my jewelry boxes
speaks for itself, but if you're comparing my work to things like cheap imported
Italian boxes, it's helpful to know that what I do not only looks different, it
is different.